USAF Grounds A-10 Pilots After “Reckless and Unauthorized” NFL Flyover

Advertisement

Four A-10C Thunderbolt II aircraft from Moody Air Force Base were involved in a low-level flight over Charlotte, North Carolina, on August 29, 2016. The aircraft passed over Bank of America Stadium, home of the Carolina Panthers, during a period when the pilots were expected to comply with the applicable altitude and speed restrictions governing flight over a populated area.

Accident Facts

Date
29 August 2016
Timeline
29 August 2016 —
Four A-10C Thunderbolt II aircraft associated with Moody Air Force Base conducted the flight over Charlotte.
1.
During the flight —
The aircraft passed over Bank of America Stadium at reported altitudes as low as 500 feet.
2.
During the operation —
The aircraft were also reported to have exceeded 250 knots below 10,000 feet.
3.
After the event —
Questions arose over whether the operation was properly authorized as a flyover and whether required waivers existed.
4.

The event drew attention because the aircraft were reported to have flown as low as 500 feet above the ground. The material accompanying the recording says the normal minimum altitude applicable to the operation was 1,000 feet and that the aircraft also exceeded the 250-knot speed restriction below 10,000 feet. It further states that the pilots did not have the waivers needed for the low-level, high-speed operation described in the preliminary FAA material.

The distinction between an approved demonstration or flyover and an ordinary low-level transit became an important part of the controversy. Internal communications reportedly showed uncertainty about how the flight should be classified. That question mattered because the regulatory basis for a low-altitude operation depends on the authorization under which it is conducted, rather than simply on whether an aircraft is performing a public flyover.

The flight involved A-10Cs assigned to the 74th Fighter Squadron of the 23rd Fighter Group at Moody Air Force Base. The aircraft type is designed for close-air-support operations and routinely operates at lower altitudes than many conventional transport or passenger aircraft. That capability does not remove the requirement to comply with the restrictions applicable to a particular operation or airspace.

The incident also became significant beyond Charlotte. The available account says the matter reached senior Air Force leadership, including the Air Force Chief of Staff and Secretary of the Air Force. The pilots were grounded while the investigation proceeded. The same source material cautions that a final FAA report had not been released at the time of the recording.

That unresolved status is important. The available record supports the altitude, speed, location and authorization questions, but it does not justify turning the preliminary characterization into a final legal or disciplinary finding. The aircraft being below an applicable altitude or above a speed limit is a factual question; the precise regulatory violations and any final accountability determination belong to the investigating authorities.

Contemporary reporting also clarified an important point that was initially misunderstood on the ground. Charlotte Douglas officials initially believed the aircraft were practicing an NFL flyover. The FAA later said that interpretation was incorrect: the A-10s had been approved to fly over the stadium as part of their departure from Charlotte Douglas, but the flight was not an official NFL flyover rehearsal. That distinction explains why the event quickly became a compliance issue rather than simply an unusually low military demonstration.

The preliminary FAA material obtained later described the requested altitude as 500 feet above ground and stated that the pilots lacked the waiver required for low-level, high-speed flight over a populated area. The report characterized the operation as careless or unsafe and cited the low-level flight and the applicable speed restriction. Those were preliminary findings, however, and should not be confused with a later final adjudication.

The Air Force response was immediate. The four pilots were restricted from flight duties while the military and FAA examined the circumstances, and the issue reached senior Air Force leadership within days. The episode also illustrates why ATC approval alone is not necessarily the same thing as regulatory authorization: a controller may approve an operational request while a separate waiver or operating restriction remains applicable.

Sources

Audio from the original air traffic control recording, sourced from public recordings and released investigation records. The reconstruction, animation and written account are our own.
Advertisement

The weekly incident